Return-Path: <r.machava@jfaife.com>
Delivered-To: ricardo@rjmtrans.co.mz
Received: from whost03.whost.co.mz
	by whost03.whost.co.mz with LMTP
	id 2DvfL1gYLGQzazcA5E7oxw
	(envelope-from <r.machava@jfaife.com>)
	for <ricardo@rjmtrans.co.mz>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 14:30:16 +0200
Return-path: <r.machava@jfaife.com>
Envelope-to: ricardo@rjmtrans.co.mz
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 14:30:16 +0200
Received: from sxb1nlsmtp02.prod.sxb1.secureserver.net ([92.204.71.173]:58826)
	by whost03.whost.co.mz with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <r.machava@jfaife.com>)
	id 1pjfnk-00FFhG-0h
	for ricardo@rjmtrans.co.mz;
	Tue, 04 Apr 2023 14:30:16 +0200
Received: from n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net ([160.153.154.159])
	by : HOSTING RELAY : with ESMTP
	id jfeCpkzoJlhpHjfeDp7eYD; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 05:20:25 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Sq9WqtC0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=642c1609
 a=Iu+7ExzzM7Eb3m00kTw9PQ==:117 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19
 a=gQX1269ULFhLm4Thdby34LUHVW0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=dKHAf1wccvYA:10
 a=vvX6zuFn5zj9u7lGGVgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=XcyuATTkOe18V1_sEiRw:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: r.machava@jfaife.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=13042 helo=n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net)
	by n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <r.machava@jfaife.com>)
	id 1pjfe7-001dMu-9p;
	Tue, 04 Apr 2023 05:20:24 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 05:20:19 -0700
From: r.machava@jfaife.com
To: Srpratico <info@srpratico.com>
Cc: Ricardo <ricardo@rjmtrans.co.mz>, Osvaldo Chissano I JFaife
 <o.chissano@jfaife.com>, c.uqueio@jfaife.com
Subject: Credential Sr Pratico
In-Reply-To: <8357F78B-DB35-403E-BB20-4B64E68A9F64@srpratico.com>
References: <8357F78B-DB35-403E-BB20-4B64E68A9F64@srpratico.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.12
Message-ID: <1682405b096e3fedfdd5398bbf1bebfd@jfaife.com>
X-Sender: r.machava@jfaife.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - rjmtrans.co.mz
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jfaife.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: r.machava@jfaife.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: n3plcpnl0136.prod.ams3.secureserver.net: r.machava@jfaife.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMyOk3WGu2/ps96oUoRSOuFb79i1JRJFT+y/WCXHwJJaySBWXvkJhHc/zuhB341cuwvgFmnbG3g54C5nIYv92/lqIbFin/q/tXKJpYI5BJUcWAGAwVM2
 2UIv1r3KBv6c1dduAeVz5Hlss7YNFiTjLSSRHrzcKodIsmLIYJ21t8O0SKjm4z1nE10VgqUN8gWueRZRmwvS+sBXuZN/E9ui/RWTuZ4dC9WTAmWSKdS61jSm
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "whost03.whost.co.mz",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Boa tarde caro Pratico, Em seguimento a nossa conversa telefonica,
    a Manica exige o segundo original do BL. No entanto, vamos submeter o processo
    sem o documento exigido enquanto se fazem diligencias para se ultrapassar
    esse [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query
                              to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to
                             usage of an open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [92.204.71.173 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
X-Spam-Flag: NO



Boa tarde caro Pratico,

Em seguimento a nossa conversa telefonica, a Manica exige o segundo 
original do BL. No entanto, vamos submeter o processo sem o documento 
exigido enquanto se fazem diligencias para se ultrapassar esse assunto. 
Em caso de algum questionario teremos que perder 750MT pela correccao. 
Caso nao surja nenhum questionario o processo ira findar assim mesmo.

Agradeco que me de formalmente o seu aval para proceder dessa forma.

Cmprts
